02502nas a2200277 4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260001200043653003300055653001800088653002600106653002300132653002700155653001900182100001200201700001600213700001500229700001700244700001400261245012100275856005800396300000900454490001300463520173400476022001402210 9998 d c07/202410aConvolutional Neural Network10aDeep Learning10aInappropriate Remarks10aInternet of things10aLong Short-Term Memory10aSocial Network1 aLou Yan1 aZhipeng Ren1 aYong Zhang1 aZhonghui Tao1 aYiwu Zhao00aConstructing the Public Opinion Crisis Prediction Model Using CNN and LSTM Techniques Based on Social Network Mining uhttps://www.ijimai.org/journal/bibcite/reference/3466 a1-110 vIn press3 aThis research endeavors to address the persistent dissemination of public opinion within social networks, mitigate the propagation of inappropriate content on these platforms, and enhance the overall service quality of social networks. To achieve these objectives, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) techniques are employed in this research to develop a predictive model for anticipating public opinion crises in social network mining. This model furnishes users with a valuable reference for subsequent decisionmaking processes. The initial phase of this research involves the collection of user behavior data from social networks using IoT technologies, serving as the basis for extensive big data analysis and neural network research. Subsequently, a social network text categorization model is constructed by amalgamating the Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architecture, elucidating the training procedures of deep learning methodologies within CNN and LSTM networks. The effectiveness of this approach is subsequently validated through comparisons with other deep learning techniques. Based on the obtained results and findings, the CNN-LSTM model demonstrates a noteworthy accuracy rate of 92.19% and an exceptionally low loss value of 0.4075. Of particular significance is the classification accuracy of the CNN-LSTM algorithm within social network datasets, which surpasses that of alternative algorithms, including CNN (by 6.31%), LSTM (by 4.43%), RNN (by 3.51%), Transformer (by 40.29%), and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) (by 4.49%). This underscores the effectiveness of the CNN-LSTM algorithm in the realm of social network text classification. a1989-1660