TY - JOUR
KW - Context of Use
KW - Haptic Device
KW - Multi-Session
KW - User Experience
KW - UEQ+
AU - Julie Manon
AU - Jean Vanderdonckt
AU - Michael Saint-Guillain
AU - Vladimir Pletser
AU - Cyril Wain
AU - Jean Jacobs
AU - Audrey Comein
AU - Sirga Drouet
AU - Julien Meert
AU - Ignacio Sanchez Casla
AU - Olivier Cartiaux
AU - Olivier Cornu
AB - While visual interaction is typically evaluated as an instantaneous, one-shot activity that considers only a snapshot of factors, haptic interaction is more challenging to evaluate as it involves a continuous touch process evolving over time. To better understand how to evaluate haptic interaction, this paper performs a multisession evaluation of a haptic device to be used by astronauts in future lunar and Mars missions, based on eight factors. Three groups of two members (𝑛  = 6 ) applied, either as operator or assistant, a newly developed external fixator (EZExFix) to fix a fracture of the tibial shaft. Astronauts had different levels of expertise, i.e., in anatomy, mechanical engineering, and without, and participated in eight timed runs. Among these eight matches, four sessions were conducted with different time frames and compared to a stress test, a reproduction of the experiment in very stressful conditions, and a session simulating critical conditions in an extra-vehicular activity.
IS - In press
M1 - In press
N2 - While visual interaction is typically evaluated as an instantaneous, one-shot activity that considers only a snapshot of factors, haptic interaction is more challenging to evaluate as it involves a continuous touch process evolving over time. To better understand how to evaluate haptic interaction, this paper performs a multisession evaluation of a haptic device to be used by astronauts in future lunar and Mars missions, based on eight factors. Three groups of two members (𝑛  = 6 ) applied, either as operator or assistant, a newly developed external fixator (EZExFix) to fix a fracture of the tibial shaft. Astronauts had different levels of expertise, i.e., in anatomy, mechanical engineering, and without, and participated in eight timed runs. Among these eight matches, four sessions were conducted with different time frames and compared to a stress test, a reproduction of the experiment in very stressful conditions, and a session simulating critical conditions in an extra-vehicular activity.
PY - 9998
SE - 1
SP - 1
EP - 11
T2 - International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence
TI - A Multi-Session Evaluation of a Haptic Device in Normal and Critical Conditions: a Mars Analog Mission
UR - https://www.ijimai.org/journal/bibcite/reference/3579
VL - In press
SN - 1989-1660
ER -